Legal Opinion

Roe v. Miles Laboratories, Inc.

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided December 4, 1989No. A89-098 CivPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HOLLAND, Chief Judge.

(Dismissal Granted)

Under the trade name “Koate”, defendant Miles Laboratories marketed the clotting component of human blood. Through a process called “fractionation”, “Factor VIII” (the clotting substance) is extracted from donated human blood of various individuals. It is now known that the process by which Koate was manufactured did not eradicate or exclude from this product the virus or viruses which can give rise to Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). At times here relevant, plaintiff (a hemophiliac) used Koate to control hemorrhaging. He is presumably…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bachner v. PearsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. North Slope Borough v. Sohio Petroleum Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Clary v. Fifth Avenue Chrysler Center, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Donnybrook Building Supply Co. v. Alaska National Bank of the NorthAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Vuono v. New York Blood Center, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Cutter Biological, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Weishorn v. Miles-CutterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Smith v. Cutter Biological, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Weishorn v. Miles-CutterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API