Legal Opinion
Rumph v. Interest of VD
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 14, 1996No. 94-1470PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
667 So.2d 998 (1996)
James RUMPH, Appellant,
v.
In the Interest of V.D., a child, etc., Appellee.
No. 94-1470.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
February 14, 1996.
Gregory A. Samms and Samia P. Giddings, Certified Legal Intern, Miami, for appellant.
Greenberg, Traurig, Hoffman, Lipoff, Rosen & Quentel and Charles M. Auslander; Robin H. Greene; Rosemarie S. Roth, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and GERSTEN, JJ.
BASKIN, Judge.
We affirm the order denying the maternal granduncle's motion for change in custody of the dependent child. The trial court based its ruling…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Flanagan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Hayes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
3Cited by4 opinions
- IB v. Department of Children and FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Department of Children & Family Services v. In the Interest of J.C.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- C.C. v. Department of Children & FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Dcfs v. JcDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002