Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Maura Healey, in Her Official Capacity as Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Uber Technologies, Inc. and Lyft, Inc.

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided June 3, 2021No. 2084CV01519-BLS1Published

1Opinion of the Court

SUPERIOR COURT

MAURA HEALEY, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND LYFT, INC.

Docket:

2084CV01519-BLS1

Dates:

March 25, 2021

Present:

Kenneth W. Salinger Justice of the Superior Court

County:

SUFFOLK, ss.

Keywords:

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Uber and Lyft pay people to use their own vehicles to transport passengers. The Attorney General claims that both companies misclassify their drivers as independent contractors, rather than as employees, and do not pay or provide all wages and related benefits…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Alan Schmidt v. John SkolasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  3. Rothman v. GregorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  4. Bryant v. Avado Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  5. Alfred L. Snapp & Son, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Ex Rel. BarezSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API