State v. Wenz

OPINION

MINGE, Judge.

Appellant challenges her conviction for driving without a valid driver’s license, arguing that her vehicle is a “motorized foot scooter” that she claims does not require an operator’s license or permit. We affirm.

FACTS

In 2000, appellant’s driver’s license was cancelled as inimical to public safety. See Minn.Stat. § 171.04, subd. 1(d)(1) (2008). On advice that certain motorized foot scooters (MFS) were exempt from driver’s license requirements, she purchased a two- * wheeled vehicle with the following specifications: 50-cubic-centimeter engine, maximum speed of 30 miles per…