Legal Opinion

United States v. $311,229.00 in U.S. Currency

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 22, 2014No. 12-16727Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

World Food Association, Inc. appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the United States in this civil forfeiture action. On appeal, World Food argues that the Government is not entitled to summary judgment because it has not established by a preponderance of the evidence that the $477,216.42 at issue in this case are proceeds traceable to wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. We agree, and reverse.

The Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act (CAERA), 18 U.S.C. § 983, establishes a burden-shifting scheme for summary judgment in civil forfeiture actions…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Ethan JinianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API