Legal Opinion
United States v. Ethan Jinian
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 26, 2013No. 11-10593PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge MURGUIA; Concurrence by Judge CHRISTEN.
OPINION
MURGUIA, Circuit Judge:
Ethan Farid Jinian was charged with fourteen counts of wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 stemming from his scheme to defraud his employer. Jinian contends that the district court erred in denying his motions for judgment of acquittal, a new trial, and for an arrest of judgment. Specifically, he argues that (1) routine transmissions occurring during the interbank collection process are not made for the purpose of executing a scheme to defraud or in furtherance thereof, (2) the jury should have been…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. JinianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- W. A. Griffin, MD v. Health Systems Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Alvaro Sanchez-AguilarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Pieper v. Benerin, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- United States v. $311,229.00 in U.S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.