Legal Opinion
Kolodzaike v. Occidental Chem. Corp.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided March 27, 2000No. CIV.A. G-99-432PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KENT, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461, challenging his denial of benefits. Now before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons that follow, that Motion is GRANTED. Consequently, Plaintiffs claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in their entirety.
I. FACTUAL SUMMARY
Plaintiff was employed by Occidental Chemical Corporation for twenty-seven years, serving in various positions at the company’s chemical plant in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Campbell v. CHEVRON PHILLIPS CHEMICAL CO., LPDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2006
- Abate v. HartfordDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2006
- Wise v. Lucent Technologies Inc. Pension PlanDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2000