Legal Opinion
Greyhound Corporation v. Rothman
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided April 8, 1949No. Civil Action 4083PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, Chief Judge.
This is a case of alleged infringement of a trade name and trade symbol, and also of unfair competition. The plaintiffs, the Greyhound Corporation and its affiliate, Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc., ask that the three defendants, doing business under a partnership known as the Greyhound Cab Co., be permanently restrained from using the trade-name “Greyhound” and the figure of a running greyhound dog as a symbol on their taxicabs in Baltimore.
Most of the material facts in the case have been stipulated by the parties. The plaintiffs conduct a nationwide passenger motor…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Yale Electric Corporation v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Skippy, Inc. v. Cpc International, Inc., Skippy, Inc. v. Cpc International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- John Walker & Sons, Ltd. v. BetheaDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1969
- Pierce v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1957
- Perini Corp. v. Perini Construction, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1989
- H. H. Scott, Inc. v. Annapolis Electroacoustic Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.