Legal Opinion

Radford v. Smith Bros.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1931No. 28235PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

This action arises under the workmen’s compensation law. Plaintiff, while employed by defendant Smith Brothers, Inc. (hereinafter called defendant), received injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment, for which he seeks compensation. He received his injuries in Gage county, Nebraska. The trial court found that plaintiff had a permanent partial disability, amounting to 85 per cent, of total disability, and awarded compensation on that basis. Defendants have appealed.

Defendants contend that the contract of employment was entered into in the state of Kansas; that the workmen’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ashton v. Blue River Power Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Davis v. Lincoln CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Johnson v. David Cole Creamery Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Frost v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Schlesselman v. Travelers InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Elk City Cotton Oil Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Fallis v. VogelNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Paulsen v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Paulsen v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Nordahl v. EricksonNebraska Supreme Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API