Legal Opinion

Gilmore v. Hill

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 30, 1957No. Civ. 17424PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDraper, J.

Plaintiff filed a creditor’s claim for $65,000 against the estate of Jay Maurice, deceased. Upon rejection of this claim by defendant administrator, plaintiff brought this action for the reasonable value of services rendered and goods furnished to decedent for a period of 11 years, pursuant to an alleged oral agreement by decedent to execute a will leaving her all his property. Defendant, later joined by interveners, demanded a bill of particulars, and when bill and amended bill were furnished, moved for further bills of particulars. On March 8, 1956, the case had been set for trial for April…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Westphal v. WestphalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Hernandez v. National Dairy Products Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Ames v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  4. Banchero v. CoffisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Yates v. StadingOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Dobbins v. HardisterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Meredith v. MarksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Burton v. Santa Barbara Nat'l BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Butler Bros. v. ConnollyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API