Contact Chiropractic, P.C. v. N.Y.C. Transit Auth.
Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors
1Dissent
GARCIA, J. (dissenting).
I would hold that an action to recover no-fault benefits-whether from insurers *873or self-insurers-is subject to the six-year statute of limitations. As the majority acknowledges, the lower courts have, for **480decades, held that a no-fault claim against an insurance company is subject to the six-year limitation (majority op. at 195-196, 75 N.Y.S.3d at 476-77, 99 N.E.3d at 870-71 [collecting cases] ). And this Court has cited to the "applicable six-year Statute of Limitations" for such claims ( ***198Gurnee v. Aetna Life & Cas. Co., 55 N.Y.2d 184, 193, 448 N.Y.S.2d 145,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kurcsics v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Montgomery v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Solnick v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Dermatossian v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.