Acosta v. Denka Performance Elastomer LLC
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA DAVID W. ACOSTA, et al. CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 20-2323 DENKA PERFORMANCE ELASTOMER, LLC, ET AL. SECTION F ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court is the DuPont defendants’ motion for an indicative ruling under Federal Rule 62.1 and a motion to amend the judgment as per Rule 60(b). For the reasons that follow, the motion for an indicative ruling is GRANTED. If the Fifth Circuit sees fit to remand the case pending appeal, the Court will GRANT the Rule 60(b) motion for an amended judgment and amend its grant of defendants’ motion to dismiss to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gonzalez v. KayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Doe Ex Rel. Magee v. Covington County School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Allen Thompson v. City of Waco, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Ross v. Conoco, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
- Butler v. Denka Performance ElastomerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.