Legal Opinion

City of Maquoketa v. Russell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 15, 1992No. 91-372PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVORATO, Justice.

In this case two minors challenge the constitutionality of a municipal curfew ordinance. The minors raise four constitutional issues associated with curfew ordinances that were left unresolved by our recent decision in City of Panora v. Simmons, 445 N.W.2d 363 (Iowa 1989). The conclusion we come to today requires us to reach only one: whether the curfew ordinance in question is invalid because it is unconstitutionally overbroad. Because we conclude the ordinance is unconstitutionally overbroad, we declare it invalid. Our conclusion requires us to reverse the minors’…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Nunez v. City Of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. Nunez v. City of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. State v. MilnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  4. Exira Community School District v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  5. State v. ReedSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API