United States v. Southern Railway Co.
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Before ALFRED P. MURRAH, Chairman, and JOHN MINOR WISDOM, EDWARD WEINFELD* EDWIN A. ROBSON, WILLIAM H. BECKER, JOSEPH S. LORD, III, and STANLEY A. WEIGEL,* Judges of the Panel. PER CURIAM.
When the first of these actions as transferred to the District of Kansas for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 1407, the two actions involving the Southern Railway Company were not transferred because we had been advised that discovery was virtually complete and that these actions would be tried in the very near future.1 In re Grain Shipments, 300 F.Supp.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Grain ShipmentsUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1969
- United States v. Penn Central Transportation Co.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1970
- United States v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1969
3Cited by3 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. TemplarCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Southern Railway Company v. TemplarCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- In Re Commodity Credit Corp. Litigation Involving Grain Shipments (No. 11)United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1973