Legal Opinion

In Re Grain Shipments

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided June 26, 1969No. 22PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

Before ALFRED P. MURRAH, Chairman, and JOHN MINOR WISDOM * EDWARD WEINFELD, EDWIN A. ROBSON, WILLIAM H. BECKER, JOSEPH S. LORD, III and STANLEY A. WEIGEL, Judges of the Panel. PER CURIAM.

The cases listed on the attached Schedule A were brought by the United States of America on behalf of the Commodity Credit Corporation to recover damages for alleged losses of grain 1 during shipment. Discrepancies between the weights recorded at the origin and the weights recorded at the destination form the basis for the Government claims. The grain was transported by the defendants in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Protection Devices & Equipment & Central Station Protection Service Antitrust CasesUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1968
  2. In Re Multidistrict Civil Actions Involving the Mid-Air Collision Near HendersonvilleUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1969
  3. In Re Multidistrict Civil Actions Arising From the Air Crash DisasterUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1969

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1972
  2. Kaiser Industries Corp. v. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1971
  3. In Re Mid-Air Collision Near Fairland, IndianaUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1970
  4. Greyhound Computer Corp. v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1972
  5. In Re Multidistrict Litigation Involving Butterfield Patent InfringementUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API