Legal Opinion

Klingensmith v. Klingensmith

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 9, 1953No. Appeal, 170PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Musmanno,

The fact that the plaintiff and defendants in this case are brother and sisters has not lessened the ardent intensity of the legal rivalry between them, nor can it dull the edge of the law called upon to do justice between them.

On March 25, 1919, Mattie M. Klingensmith and Effie B. Klingensmith became owners in fee simple (by deed from their parents) of a farm in Salem Township, Westmoreland County. In that year Harry S. Klingensmith left the farm to go live elsewhere. . Thé two sisters, with their father, managed the farm, working and tilling the soil until…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hart v. CarrollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
  2. Haskell v. HeathcoteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Beaver v. SlaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  4. Greenlee v. GreenleeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
  5. Postlethwait v. FreaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Schuster v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Concorde Investments, Inc. v. GallagherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Ridley Park Shopping Center, Inc. v. Sun Ray Drug Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Kurland v. StolkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. M. Leff Radio Parts, Inc. v. Mattel, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API