Shell Pipe Line Corp. v. Coston
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
PELPHREY, O. J.
The Shell Pipe Line Corporation has appealed from judgment rendered against it for damages in favor of R. M. Coston, which Coston claimed arose from the construction of a pipe line and telephone line across his land under an easement.
The written instrument granting the easement conferred upon the pipe line company a “right of way from time to time to lay, construct, reconstruct, replace, renew, maintain, repair, change the size of and remove pipes and pipe lines for the transportation of oil, petroleum, or any of its products, gas, water and other substances, or any thereof,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RaneyTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Jones-O'Neal Furniture Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- St. Louis, S. F. & T. Ry. Co. v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
3Cited by10 opinions
- Royal v. CameronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Shamblen v. Great Lakes Pipe Line Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1954
- Barrera v. Duval County Ranch Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Davis v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Jenkins v. Pure Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.