Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Bonsall v. Case

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1933No. 24393. Department TwoPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This is an original application in this court for a writ of mandamus.

The relator, C. S. Bonsall, for more than a year prior to January 11, 1933, was the duly qualified and acting’ deputy auditor of this state. The respondent is the duly elected, qualified and acting treasurer of the state. The relator’s connection with the state auditor’s office was severed January 11, 1933, and he has not since that time been in the service of the state in the auditor’s office. Jaiutary 10, 1933, or the day before his connection with the auditor’s office ceased, the relator prepared a voucher for a period of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Eshelman v. CheethamWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  2. State ex rel. Post-Intelligencer Publishing Co. v. LindsleyWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  3. State ex rel. Olympia National Bank v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kasper v. City of EdmondsWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Ramey v. Michigan Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Smith v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Save-Way Drug, Inc. v. Standard Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  5. Willis T. Batcheller, Inc. v. Welden Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API