Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Peizer

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided April 7, 1949No. File 5501PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

The instant action is one to recover a judgment against the defendant estate in which Saul L. Peizer as administrator is also made a defendant. The complaint in three counts seeks judgment on three claims alleged to have accrued during the lifetime of said decedent, which claims were presented to the administrator and disallowed by him. An attachment was made in said action by garnishee process of certain funds owned by said estate. An order to dissolve said garnishment is sought by motion.

A creditor has the right to establish his claim by securing a judgment. He does not have the right to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coit v. SistareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  2. Green v. BarkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1841
  3. Flynn v. MorganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887
  4. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. HallConnecticut Superior Court · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rasmussen v. HuntingtonVermont Superior Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API