Legal Opinion

Raleigh Realty Co. v. Lagomarsino

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 16, 1939No. 8 Div. 928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

The appeal is from a decree sustaining demurrers directed to the equity of an amended bill as a whole.

Broadly speaking, the bill seeks redemption of real estate from a mortgage.

The parties áre successors in right to the original mortgagor and mortgagee, having, under’ the- 'averments of the bill, the same equities; They will, therefore, be referred to. as mortgagor and mortgagee.

The bill discloses a foreclosure, or attempted foreclosure, of the mortgage under power of sale. If to be treated as a bill to effectuate the statutory right' of redemption, it was subject to apt…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wood v. EstesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Randolph v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. Scott v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  4. Black v. Slocumb Mule Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Read v. Flaketown Graphite Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Montgomery v. Brendle Fire Equipment, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  2. McGowan v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  3. Robino v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  4. Spry v. PruittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API