In re Thompson
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION DISALLOWING PROOF OF CLAIM AND DENYING CONFIRMATION OF AMENDED PLAN
TOM R. CORNISH, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE
The Court is faced with two issues: 1) whether to allow an untimely proof of claim filed by the Debtor’s home mortgage creditor, JPMorgan Chase Bank; and 2) whether to confirm the Debtor’s Amended Plan which proposes to pay nothing on the mortgage debt but be deemed current on his mortgage at the conclusion of his chapter 13 plan. For reasons set forth below, the Court finds that it must disallow Chase’s late-filed claim, but it cannot confirm the Debtor’s Amended Plan as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In re PajianCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Matteson v. Bank of America, N.A. (In re Matteson)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- In re AlonsoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2015
- In re BrownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Soriano v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In re Soriano)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2018
- Hans Dajung ChoeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2019