Legal Opinion

City of Fort Worth v. Dietert

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 10, 1954No. 15543PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RENFRO, Justice.

On July 24, 1953, Glade' Construction Company, hereinafter called Glade, acting under a contract with the City ■ of Fort Worth for the construction of a storm sewer, entered upon land belonging to Arthur E. Dietert and wife, cutting down some trees and damaging the land. At Mrs. Dietert’s request, Glade ceased operations and left the preriii-ses. Sometime thereafter the City of Fort Worth attempted to reach an agreement with the Dieterts' to purchase a right -of way for the sewer but was unable to do so.

On October 30, 1953, the City of'Fort Worth institituted condemnation…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. WardTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. State v. CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. RubyTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. City of Houston v. KunzeTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Texas Western Railway Co. v. CaveTexas Supreme Court · 1891

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Glade v. DietertTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  2. City of Austin v. LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  3. Hammon v. Wichita CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  4. Hanford-Southport, LLC. v. City of San Antonio, Acting by and Through the San Antonio Water System, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2012
  5. Glade v. DietertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API