Legal Opinion
Sands v. Menard, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided April 14, 2009No. 2008AP1703PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrunner, J.
¶ 1. Menard, Inc., appeals a judgment and order denying its motion to vacate a portion of an arbitration award requiring it to reinstate former employee Dawn Sands. Menard contends the arbitration panel manifestly disregarded the law by requiring Menard to reinstate Sands. We affirm the judgment and order.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2. Sands, an attorney, was terminated from her employment as vice president and executive general counsel for Menard after a dispute over her compensation. Sands believed Menard was engaging in gender-based pay discrimination. Pursuant to a binding arbitration agreement, Sands…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- State v. PettitCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
- Williams v. Pharmacia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Hybert v. Hearst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Lukowski v. DankertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sands v. Menard, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- Sands v. Menard, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013