Legal Opinion

Corning Glass Works v. Coe

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 10, 1944No. 8531PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The findings and judgment of the trial court, 51 F.Supp. 232, find full support in the record. Appellant has failed to meet the burden imposed upon a plaintiff in a Section 4915 proceeding1 and is not entitled to a patent.

Affirmed.

35 U.S.C.A. § 63; Abbott v. Coe, 71 App.D.C. 195, 197, 198, 109 F.2d 449, 451, 452; Daniels v. Coe, 73 App.D.C. 54, 58, 116 F.2d 941, 945; Morrison v. Coe, 75 U.S.App.D.C. 219, 220, 127 F.2d 737, 738.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Abbott v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  2. Daniels v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  3. Morrison v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  4. Corning Glass Works v. CoeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1943

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Besser v. OomsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946