Legal Opinion

Hess v. Fair Employment & Housing Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 17, 1982No. Civ. 51522PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MILLER, J.

Victor and Helen Hess appeal from a judgment denying their petition for writ of administrative mandamus, which sought to compel respon dent to set aside its decision holding that appellants unlawfully discriminated against real parties in interest.

Real parties in interest John Pryor and Debbie Rodgers reached an agreement to rent a duplex owned by appellants, and paid a deposit on the unit. The Hesses subsequently learned that Pryor and Rodgers are an unmarried couple, and refused to rent to them. Appellants admitted that they would have rented the unit to Piyor and Rodgers…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cadc 79-145 Jerry W. Markham and Marcia J. Harris, A/K/A Marcia Markham v. Colonial Mortgage Service Co., Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  2. Atkisson v. Kern County Housing AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Walnut Creek Manor v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Peralta Community College District v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. McHugh v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Smith v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Foreman v. Anchorage Equal Rights CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API