Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 27, 2005No. 00C-48195; A114694PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Defendant was convicted of felony murder, ORS 163.115(l)(b); manufacture of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992; and felon in possession of a firearm, ORS 166.270. After the trial court allowed a police officer to recount the incriminating confession of a nontestifying codefendant, defendant moved for a mistrial. The court denied the motion. On appeal, we hold that the denial was error. We also conclude that the controlled substance charge and the felony murder charge were not “connected together or constituting parts of a common scheme or plan” for the purposes of joinder under ORS…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Gray v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. State v. DewhittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. EnnisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. State v. GarrisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API