Legal Opinion

Hmeidan v. Muheisen

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 18, 2017No. 2017CA00069PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGwin, P.J.

{¶ 1} Appellant appeals the April 10, 2017 judgment entry of the Stark County Court of Common Pleas.

Facts & Procedural History

{¶ 2} Appellees Eddie and Mimi Hmeidan filed a forcible entry and detainer action against appellant Hasan Muheisen with regards to the commercial property located at 125-12th Street N.E. in Canton, Ohio. Appellant filed counterclaims regarding the property for declaratory judgment, quiet title, breach of contract, specific performance, promissory estoppel, implied contract, and equitable lien. Appellant also filed a motion to transfer the case to the common pleas…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Smiddy v. Wedding Party, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Doe v. ShafferOhio Supreme Court · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Concrete, Inc. v. WillowickOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. Concrete, Inc. v. WillowickOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. Third Fed. S. & L. Assn. of Cleveland v. PajanyOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API