Legal Opinion

Smith v. Henson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 20, 2008No. 2-07-151-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LEE ANN DAUPHINOT, Justice.

Gail Smith appeals from a jury verdict in favor of Dr. Alan Henson, D.C., on Smith’s negligence claim against him. She argues that the trial court erred by excluding evidence relating to workers’ compensation and by making an improper comment on the weight of the evidence. Because we hold that Smith has not preserved error on her complaints, we affirm.

Smith brought a negligent treatment claim against Henson based on his treatment of her work-related carpal tunnel syndrome and hip problems. She claimed that when she saw Henson at an appointment to address her…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
  3. Udolf v. Plan & Zoning Commission of West HartfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. State v. WilemonTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Goode v. RameyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Patrick Wayne Womble v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2013
  2. Smith v. HensonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
  3. World Car Nissan v. Abe's Paint & Body, Inc., Abraham Rodriguez, and Chin Pac, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API