Legal Opinion
Morrow v. Black
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 3, 1990No. 89 CV 3516PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PLATT, Chief Judge.
Defendants Revien, Cohen, Ellenbogen, Curylo, Berg, and Matthias & Berg move pursuant to Federal Rules 12(b)(6) and 9(b) of Civil Procedure to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint.
Plaintiff’s complaint asserts ten claims against all defendants 1 (i) civil conspiracy to defraud, (ii) violation of Section 1962(c) of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, (“RICO”), i.e., employees or associates of an enterprise which engages in interstate commerce who conduct or participate in that enterprises affairs through a pattern of racketeering, (iii)…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Center Cadillac, Inc. v. Bank Leumi Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- 131 Main Street Associates v. MankoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- In Re Sahlen & Associates, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1991
- Mathon v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- In Re Integrated Resources Real Estate Ltd. Partnerships Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.