Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Beasley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 5, 1992Published

1Dissent

Callahan, J. P.

(dissenting). I do not concur with the rationale enunciated in the majority writing nor in their conclusion to reverse defendant’s conviction of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [1]). Defendant was indicted with two other men (Florence and Washington) for killing Christopher Tuck in Rochester on December 5, 1989. The codefendants were tried separately; Florence was convicted of murder and Washington was acquitted. At defendant’s trial, two eyewitnesses testified that defendant shot Tuck from a distance of six feet. The medical examiner testified that Tuck was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. VentimigliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. GriffinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API