Obsidian Finance Group, LLC v. Cox
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION & ORDER
HERNANDEZ, District Judge:
Plaintiffs Obsidian Finance Group, LLC and Kevin Padrick bring this defamation *1222action against defendant Crystal Cox. In a July 7, 2011 Opinion & Order, 2011 WL 2745849 I denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability after determining that the challenged statements were protected by the First Amendment.
Defendant did not cross-move for summary judgment. However, given my conclusion, I gave notice in the July 7, 2011 Opinion that I intended to grant summary judgment for defendant “independent of the motion.”…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Evel Knievel Krystal Knievel v. Espn, a Subsidiary of Walt Disney, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Greenbelt Cooperative Publishing Assn., Inc. v. BreslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Old Dominion Branch No. 496 v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Andrea Dworkin Priscilla Moree Judith Fouts v. Hustler Magazine Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ghanam v. DoesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Obsidian Finance Group, LLC v. Crystal CoxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Neumann v. LilesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Yes on 24-367 Committee v. DeatonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Fox v. Hamptons at Metrowest Condominium Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.