Legal Opinion
Harty v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
Decided July 12, 2007No. 06-06-00011-CRPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Chief Justice MORRISS.
Russel Cole Harty had previously pled guilty to indecency with a child and had received community supervision. 1 The terms of that community supervision required that Harty, among other things, avoid “injurious and vicious habits”; and “not possess any printed, photographed, or recorded material” that could be used for his “deviant sexual arousal.” Those terms also required that Harty “execute releases of confidential information” allowing free exchange of information between his sex-offender therapist and the corrections department, that Harty submit to…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Duke v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2012
- Kevin Fahrni v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2015
- in the Matter of A.M., a Juvenile, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2011
- Darling v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
- Boyett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.