Legal Opinion

H. Daya International Co. v. Do Denim LLC

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 15, 2017No. 16 Civ. 8668 (VM)Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

VICTOR MARRERO, United States District Judge.

Plaintiff H. Daya International Co. Ltd. (“H. Daya”) brought this action against Do Denim LLC (“Do Denim”), Reward Jean LLC (“Reward Jean”), R. Siskind & Co., Inc. (“Siskind & Co.”), Salomon Murciano (“Murciano”), Vintage Apparel Group LLC (“Vintage Apparel”), Only Brands, Inc. (“Only Brands”), and Richard Siskind (“Siskind”) (collectively, “Defendants”) to enforce a prior judgment against Do Denim and Reward Jean. (“Amended Complaint,” Dkt. No. 56.) H. Daya alleges that Do Denim and Reward Jean fraudulently transferred assets to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  4. Gregory v. DalyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance v. PorcoNew York Court of Appeals · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API