Legal Opinion

Union Bank & Trust Co. v. Lynn

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1925No. 5,709PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

Plaintiff commenced this action to recover on a negotiable promissory note, indorsed and delivered to it prior to maturity by the payee. Defendants in their answer allege facts which they contend establish payment of the note, which allegations are denied by replication.

The facts sufficiently appear from the opinion. A jury trial was waived, and, after hearing all of the evidence, the court entered judgment dimissing the action, from which judgment this appeal is prosecuted.

Plaintiff contends that the judgment is not supported by the evidence and is “against law.” There is little conflict in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Musolf v. Duluth Edison Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. State National Bank v. HyattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  3. Andrews v. Northwestern National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. Clarke v. IrwinNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Dodge v. BirkenfeldMontana Supreme Court · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank v. Omaha National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Harbaugh's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Union Finance Co. v. National Bank in North Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API