Legal Opinion
Irvin v. Amerada Hess Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 8, 1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries pursuant to Labor Law §§ 200, 241 (6) and 240, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated January 7, 1991, as granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on stated conditions, and the *479defendants have filed a notice of cross appeal from the imposition of those conditions.
Ordered that the cross appeal is dismissed as abandoned; and it is further,
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,
Ordered that the defendants are awarded one bill of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gutierrez v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Torres v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Stuto v. Coastal Dry Dock & Repair Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Duncanson-Harrelson Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wistrom v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
3Cited by5 opinions
- Eriksen v. Long Island Lighting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Tompkins v. Port of New York AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- McDonald v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Agis v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Hotchkiss v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996