Legal Opinion
Wistrom v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 28, 1989No. C1-88-2373PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAROLD W. SCHULTZ, Judge.
Appellant was injured while working at respondent’s Two Harbors ore docks and taconite storage facility. The action was brought under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-60 (1986). Respondent moved for summary judgment, contending appellant’s sole remedy was that provided by the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act. The trial court granted respondent’s motion for summary judgment, and Wistrom has appealed. 1
FACTS
Respondent Duluth, Missabe and Iron Range Railway Company (DM & IR) operates a taconite unloading and loading facility at…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Northeast Marine Terminal Co. v. CaputoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- P. C. Pfeiffer Co. v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Herb's Welding, Inc. v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Duncanson-Harrelson Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Sea-Land Services, Inc., and Travelers Insurance Company v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, and Haym Ganish, Real PartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Torres v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Tompkins v. Port of New York AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Irvin v. Amerada Hess Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Jacobson v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Johnson v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989