Legal Opinion
Dyer v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 24, 1994No. C011675PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
workers who are injured in the course of employment. (See Judson Steel Corp. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1978) 22 Cal.3d 658 [150 Cal.Rptr. 250, 586 P.2d 564].) In proceedings before the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB), the respondent Franchise Tax Board was found to have discriminated against petitioner Rosetha Dyer because of a work injury within the meaning of Labor Code section 132a. The Franchise Tax Board was ordered to pay an increased compensation award and to reinstate Dyer to the probationary position she held at the time of her injury. On writ of review, Dyer…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Judson Steel Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Thorne v. City of El SegundoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- R. Nelson Brunnemann, Cross-Appellant v. Terra International, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Department of Rehabilitation v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Currie v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Bd.California Supreme Court · 2001
- State of California v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- Norton v. San Bernardino City Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Currie v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Bd.California Supreme Court · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.