Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Huffman

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1922No. 22016PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFlansburg, J.

This was an action to recover on a contract of guaranty, signed by the defendants, Huffman and Gordon, and purporting to guarantee a $5,000 note, payable by the Omaha Motor Car Company to Walter Moise. The case was tried without a jury. The court found generally in favor of the defendants, and the plaintiff appeals.

The defense is grounded upon the fact that the guaranty agreement purported to cover a note, to be payable in six months, and that Walter Moise, instead of taking a note payable in six months, in accordance with the terms of the guaranty contract, took a note payable in four…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Warren v. LyonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  2. Chandler Lumber Co. v. RadkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Robertson v. Southwestern Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  4. W. T. Rawleigh Medical Co. v. BunningNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Quinn v. MossNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Knox v. CookNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Production Credit Ass'n v. SchmerNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. BUILDERS SUPPLY CO., INC. v. CzerwinskiNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Fischer v. Curtis State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. HeyneNebraska Supreme Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API