Legal Opinion

Williams v. LaPenotiere

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1890PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtRaney, C. J.

That the plaintiff in error has not paid the damages allowed as for a frivolous appeal, by the judgment of this court rendered at the June term, 1889, dismissing the appeal on account of appellant’s omission to file the transcript of the record here within the time required by law, (Williams vs. LaPenotiere, 25 Fla., 473; S. C. 6 So. Reporter, 167,) is no ground for dismissing this writ of error. The appellee, then, who is now defendant in error, has a sufficient remedy for collecting the amount allowed him as damages.

*334Objections to any part of the record as having been filed here since the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Williams v. LaPenotiereSupreme Court of Florida · 1889

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer v. GuckenheimerSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
  2. Groendyke v. MusgraveSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Williams v. LaPenotiereSupreme Court of Florida · 1893
  4. Garner v. GarnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
  5. Pyles v. BeallSupreme Court of Florida · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API