Legal Opinion

Maddox v. Stone

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 24, 1957No. 36824PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, C. J.

1. In order for a conditional-sale contract to be valid and have precedence of a judgment creditor, it must be in writing and be attested. Code §§ 67-1401, 67-1402; Flemming v. Drake, 163 Ga. 872 (2) (137 S. E. 268); Mann v. Thompson, 86 Ga. 347 (12 S. E. 746); Harp v. Patapsco Guano Co., 99 Ga. 752 (27 S. E. 181); Hill v. Ludden & Bates Southern Music House, 113 Ga. 320 (38 S. E. 752).

2. It follows that where an automobile was delivered to one undertaking to purchase it on Noveniber 24, 1956, together with an invoice showing the name of the seller and purchaser and containing the statement…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harp v. Patapsco Guano Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  2. Hill v. Ludden & Bates Southern Music HouseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Morris & Co. v. Walker Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  4. Flemming v. DrakeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  5. Mann v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stephens v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API