Rembert v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
A jury convicted appellant Ranzy Cleo Rembert of one count each of battery with intent to commit a crime and sexual assault. He now appeals from the district court’s judgment of conviction and alleges three assignments of error. According to appellant, the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to support his conviction, the district court erred in refusing to declare a mistrial, and the district court erred in permitting the prosecution to present improper impeachment evidence. For the reason set forth below, we reverse and remand for a new trial.
THE FACTS
On May 14, 1985, the…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Daly v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Deeds v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1981
- Washington v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1980
- Washington v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by12 opinions
- Greene v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1997
- Gaxiola v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2005
- Rowbottom v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1989
- Lobato v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Sherman v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.