Legal Opinion

Rowbottom v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1989No. 19294PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

A jury convicted appellant Matthew Frank Rowbottom (Row-bottom) of first degree murder with use of a deadly weapon. He now appeals from the district court’s judgment of conviction and contends: (1) that the district court erred in denying his motions to suppress evidence; (2) that the district court erred in admitting evidence of his prior misconduct; and (3) that the district court erred in denying his motion for a new trial based on juror misconduct. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

THE FACTS

In the early afternoon of August 26, 1987, a Reno…

3Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Blackburn v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by29 opinions

  1. Rosky v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Johnson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Greene v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Butler v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Bigpond v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2012

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API