Legal Opinion

In Re Sealed Case

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 6, 1989No. 89-5045PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS.

Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge MIKVA.

STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge:

On October 6, 1988 the United States Attorney had appellant served with three grand jury subpoenas duces tecum, addressed to him as custodian of the corporate records of three different corporations. Appellant formally notified the U.S. Attorney that he would not comply with two of the subpoenas, asserting that producing those records would violate his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. Upon application by the government, the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. United States v. RylanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Bryan Kirby Barrett, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Gerardo Acevedo, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  2. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated October 29, 1992. United States of America v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  3. In Re Sealed Case (Government Records)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  4. In re Grand Jury Subpoena Dated November 12, 1991Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  5. In Re Grand Jury WitnessesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API