Legal Opinion
Nash v. Auburn University
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided March 16, 1987No. 85-7675PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES E. DOYLE, Senior District Judge:
Appellants Nash and Perry seek injunctive relief and damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for constitutional violations in their suspension from the Auburn University School of Veterinary Medicine on a charge of academic dishonesty. They brought this action on September 20, 1985, also alleging a pendent state law claim for breach of contract by wrongful suspension. After a hearing on September 25, appellants were granted a temporary restraining order, under which they were allowed to audit classes and to take the tests required of other students enrolled in the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Watson Ex Rel. Watson v. BeckelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Gomes v. University of Maine SystemDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2005
- Roach v. University of UtahDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1997
- Craig v. Selma City School BoardDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1992
- J.S. Ex Rel. Duck v. Isle of Wight County School BoardDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.