Loftin v. Dagley
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SEBRING, J.:
Defendants’ railroad tracks extend north and south through the City of Port Orange. Within the city limits, they pass over Dunlawton Street, which runs east and west. At the point of intersection, the Railway Company maintains a public crossing.
Although Dunlawton Street is 50 feet wide, and its entire width is used for pedestrian travel, a strip of the street only 20 feet wide is hard-surfaced for vehicular traffic. Where the defendants’ tracks pass over this strip, the Railway Company maintains a wooden crossing for the purpose of general traffic on the highway. This crossing is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Skinner v. OchiltreeSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. Hamilton Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1912
- Dunn Bus Service, Inc. v. WiseSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bould v. TouchetteSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Lawrence v. Florida East Coast Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Chambers v. LoftinSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Talcott v. HollDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Lillie Mozell Shirey and Ernest D. Shirey v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.