Matthew Legault v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION MATTHEW LEGAULT PLAINTIFF v. CASE NO. 4:24-CV-00728-BSM COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION DEFENDANT ORDER Matthew Legault’s motion to compel [Doc. No. 35] is denied for the following reasons. A. Reviewing Files In Native Format Legault’s motion to compel Costco to provide him with native files and metadata is denied because Costco states the files are security sensitive configuration files. While Legault argues that this is insufficient, Costco has offered to make the files available to Legault. Costco Response, Doc.…