Legal Opinion

South Down Liquors, Inc. v. Hayes

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 29, 1991No. 153, September Term, 1989PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MeAULIFFE, Judge.

Respondent suffered an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment. More than two months after receiving an award of compensation, and after receiving workers’ compensation benefits of $37,323 from his employer’s compensation insurer, respondent filed an action against petitioner in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County, contending that petitioner’s negligence caused his injury. Petitioner, relying on the provisions of Maryland Rules 2-201 and 2-211, filed a motion asking the court to order the joinder of the workers’ compensation insurer as an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baltimore Transit Co. v. State Rx Rel. SchrieferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  2. Security Insurance Co. of New Haven v. ManganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  3. Collins v. United Pacific InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  4. Stark v. GrippCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
  5. South Down Liquors, Inc. v. HayesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Adams v. ManownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. CR-RSC Tower I, LLC v. RSC Tower I, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  3. Garay v. OverholtzerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Fairbanks v. McCarterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. Hastings v. MechalskeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API