Legal Opinion

Baumlisberger v. Dorman, Banking & Securities Commissioner

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 5, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Richardson

Affirming in part and reversing in part.

Again we are required to review a proceeding to reorganize, under section 165a-64, Kentucky Statutes, 1933 Supplement, the Jefferson County Bank.

An action for that purpose was first instituted in the Franklin circuit court. It entered a decree approving the plan of reorganization. On an appeal it was reversed solely for the want of jurisdiction of that court. See Sweeny et al. v. Jefferson County Bank’s Reorganization Committee et al., 250 Ky. 187, 61 S. W. (2d) 1090. 'Thereafter, the reorganization committee…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Milner v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  2. Dorman, Banking Com'r v. DellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  3. Board of Registration Com'rs. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  4. Jennings v. Fidelity Columbia Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. Button v. NevinArizona Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dorman v. BaumlisbergerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  2. Crews v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Baumlisberger v. Dorman, Banking Com'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  4. Snowden v. Dorman, Bank'g and Securities Com'r.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API