Legal Opinion

Frost Gear & Forge Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 7, 1932No. H-454Published

1Opinion of the CourtWhauet, Judge

The plaintiff is a manufacturer of several kinds of gears, i. e., pinion, ring, differential, and transmission. It is the successor to a partnership which had been making these gears for printing presses, pumping machines, wire bending machines, and many other classes of machinery for many years prior to the advent of the automobile, auto truck, or motor cycle.

This suit is brought to recover taxes paid under sections 900, subdivision (3) of the revenue acts of 1918 and 1921 (40 Stat. 1122, 42 Stat. 291), and section 600, subdivision (3) of the revenue act of 1924 (43 Stat. 253, 322), on sales…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Universal Battery Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Atwater Kent Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1926
  3. Weeks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API