Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 17, 1999No. CR 98-256PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert L. Brown, Justice.

This is the second time that the appeals of appellants Antonio Williams, Kendrick Gillum, and Demarco T. Wilson from capital-murder convictions have been submitted to this court for decision. On November 19, 1998, their appeals were submitted, and we halted consideration after Williams and Gillum filed a petition for error coram nobis. We granted the petition for all three appellants and reinvested the trial court with jurisdiction to hear the matter. See Williams v. State, 335 Ark. 453, 983 S.W.2d 407 (1998) (per curiam). The error coram nobis petition alleged that…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Echols v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Union Pacific Railroad v. SharpSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Sasser v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Harmon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Dodson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Tryon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  5. Gates v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API